Justia – a comprehensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, and case law at both the federal and state levels.
A reduce court may well not rule against a binding precedent, even though it feels that it's unjust; it may well only express the hope that a higher court or maybe the legislature will reform the rule in question. In the event the court thinks that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and wishes to evade it and help the regulation evolve, it might both hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts from the cases; some jurisdictions allow for just a judge to recommend that an appeal be completed.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The regulation enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair towards the offender and the Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other courts However they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
Sign up for E-mail Notification of recent opinions The cases listed down below have had opinions filed for them within the last fourteen times. The following information is available for Every single case: Information Sheet - Click a case number to view case details, including signing JusticesJudges and participating attorneys.
This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a very fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding attained from the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In the event the summary or finding is which include no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court might interfere with the conclusion or even the finding and mildew the relief to make it acceptable for the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority would be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-recognize the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. To the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified from the decision from the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement from the laws, the legal system adheres on the doctrine of stare decisis
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a 12-year previous boy from his home to protect him from the Awful physical and sexual abuse he had endured in his home, also to prevent him from abusing other children in the home. The boy was placed within an crisis foster home, and was later shifted about within the foster care system.
The court system is then tasked with interpreting the legislation when it is actually unclear the way it applies to any supplied situation, generally rendering judgments based within the intent of lawmakers as well as the circumstances from the case at hand. These kinds of decisions become a guide for future similar cases.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to the main case, it is also a well-founded proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is topic for the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives of your police is always to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and above all, be certain regulation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The legislation enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair to the offender and the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court along with from other Courts, but they have did not have any corrective effect on it.
The Cornell Legislation School website offers several different information on legal topics, like citation of case regulation, and also provides a video tutorial on case citation.
The reason for this difference is that these civil regulation jurisdictions adhere into a tradition that the reader should manage to deduce the logic from the decision along with the statutes.[four]
seventeen . Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 46 I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues from the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to your interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) of the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession with the subjected premises for the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs for being decided by the competent court after hearing the parties if pending because the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer within the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has got to see this component for interim custody read more of the topic premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, Additionally it is a very well-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is issue to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.